Saturday, June 18, 2011

Intolerance?

headscarves. I feel incredibly intolerant lately. I’m unsure if the way I’m thinking is being intolerant, or if I’m feeling guilty for no reason.
Until recently I had not really come across women who not only wear headscarves, but who then have another covering over their mouths and noses, so they only part of the face that is seen is the eyes. Of course I’ve seen pictures of people wearing such things, but it is different being confronted by such things in person. And I do find it confronting. Every time I see it I shudder.
Am I being intolerant? I don’t know. I don’t have a problem with the muslim religion. But I certainly don’t think that total body covering is required in order to be a good muslim. I think I react so strongly when I see it because it feels like these women are dressing in that way through fear. No man would let anyone tell him to cover all his body! Have these women been led to believe that women are inherently inferior creatures, that they have less rights than men. Why is it that the men can show their faces but the women cannot? Are the men in their families telling these women they are sinfula and evil if they show their face? What motivates it? And how can it be allowed in society today?
I agree with freedom of expression, but I can’t believe that these women are free to express themselves and they choose to cover everything but their eyes. I cannot see freedom in that action.

Posted by Rosepetal in 10:56:14 | Permalink | Comments Off

Monday, January 24, 2011

Dithering in limbo

I consider myself to be in limbo these days. In more ways than one. I am stuck in the middle of cultures, in between jobs, and, most relevant to this post, in confusion about beliefs. I really hate limbo. And I can get out of it in some ways in terms of jobs. I can choose a path and follow it until I can’t anymore. It is the limbo of beliefs that really gets me down.
I can’t help feeling frustrating. I was once someone with strong beliefs. I’m sure that is evident from some of my previous posts. I am not that person anymore. But now I’m stuck in the middle, not quite believing but not quite disbelieving. For some this would not be a problem. But it bothers me. And I am especially bothered because I can’t work out how to choose a side. There are people I could talk to about the problem, but inevitably anyone I talk to will bring their own beliefs into the conversation. Talking to a believer, they are naturally going to feel that God holds the answer to end my confusion. An atheist will naturally bring to the table the conviction that I will feel more certain if I stop living for some imaginary force and start to live for myself.

So here I continue to be; Stuck in the middle and not a clue how to resolve my dilemma.

Posted by Rosepetal in 05:39:06 | Permalink | Comments Off

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Fancy a game?

I had a thought recently. Thinking deeply can be a bit like playing the game Jenga. You know. You have a stack of blocks piled up, each row made up of 3 blocks. The challenge is to remove the blocks one by one and not make the tower fall. For an extra challenge you then have to place each block you remove on the top of the tower. This means that as you go along the tower gets more and more precarious while also getting higher and higher.

So how is this remotely like deep thinking? Well, it is! I’m a deep thinker, always have been. I went to university expecting that I would know more by the end. If you want to come out of university feeling that you know more I recommend that you don’t study philosphy. I find that for me all that happened was that I ended even more confused about what is right and what is wrong. In other words I came out with a whole lot of knowledge all stacked up on top of itself, but it was like in that process I had been eroding the stuff I thought I knew for certain.

For me this was to do with religion, but it is a theory by no means restricted to religion. It has been happening down the ages. People believed that the earth was flat. Then some deep thinkers started to challenge the whole idea and eventually that belief was challenged. People believed that the sun revolved around the earth, and look what happened to that idea. Smashed flat! any time you meet someone with a different way of seeing the world you are potentially pulling another block out of the foundation of the tower of your knowledge and understanding.

So now I have a question. You suddenly realise you are eroding your deeply held belief system. Now what? Is it better  to stop while the beliefs are still standing, no matter that the foundation is precarious, or is it better to let the belief system topple and then take on the scary and uncertain task of rebuilding?

Posted by Rosepetal in 14:53:14 | Permalink | Comments Off

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Physical responses

I’m fascinated by the way my body responds to things. In particular the way my body responds to romantic and tender moments in movies or tv shows. I watch something that is romantic or tender and caring between 2 people who love each other and I feel a physical response. My fingers tingle. My heart feels like it jumps.

This physical response is basically instantaneous and is definitely not something I can choose or control. I know I enjoy it somehow, but there’s nothing especially pleasurable about it. How does my body respond to something that is an emotional trigger? And why does my body respond? Is it that I am lonely and crave this sort of moment in my own life? That explains the emotional response but not the physical response. Is it a sexual response? Something that if it continued would lead to sexual arousal? It is believed that sexual arousal in women is in stimulated significantly by emotion, so I suppose it’s possible. I just don’t know.

Posted by Rosepetal in 15:22:58 | Permalink | Comments Off

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Original sin

I have been having some interesting thoughts about weight and size and the opinion of the fashion community towards these issues lately. These thoughts have been sparked from watching a couple of semi-reality shows. One of the shows I have been very interested in and enjoyed immensely – Project Catwalk/Project Runway. This is a show that is kind of the equivalent of Idol, but for fashion designers. It sees a group of fashion designers creating garments each week and then these garments are modeled, of course by super skinny models. While I enjoy the show I am occasionally struck by the comments the judges make about the way the models look – saying that it is unacceptable to make clothing that makes a girl look like she has slightly bigger hips or slightly bigger thighs. It frustrates me. These judges are looking for originality and innovation in design but want to be sheep who think like everyone else when it comes to what body shape looks good. Don’t they realize how much power the fashion industry has over what shapes are held up as being attractive?
One episode I found particularly interesting. One of the designers was herself working as a plus-sized model before coming on the show as a way of making money. She  was in the final and she created a collection with some designs made for skinny women and other designs made for bigger women. And the judges told her that she should stick to one or the other. As a bigger woman I wanted to applaud her. I always feel that it is very hard to find original and interesting clothes for bigger women. I can’t think of one top designer who is a household name who considers both markets in that way, and that frustrates me. I’m not a fashionista myself, but I like clothes that are slightly unusual. I wish that occasionally I could walk into a little arty boutique and find that it sold clothes in my size.
An interesting outcome from watching this show and the frustrations I have felt has been that I have decided I want to learn to sew and try to design interesting clothes for myself. I’m sure I’ll fall flat on my face, but I want to give it a go.

The other show I have watched a little of that frustrated me was the first season of America’s Next Top Model. I only got through the first show before packing that one in! It was pathetic. But it frustrated me because I thought it might have something work watching when I first started. The host, Tyra Banks, began her introduction for the show saying she was looking for people of all shapes and sizes. But when the finalists were picked they were all tall and skinny. I’m not attacking Tyra Banks. Since the creation of this show she has put on some weight and proved that she is not tied down by the stereotypical fashion industry image of beauty. But on this show I felt she was somewhat hypocritical. Anyway, there was one finalist picked who was slightly bigger than the others. And I mean slightly bigger, I couldn’t tell the difference myself. But when she was being considered by the judges they stated, “She must be being considered for the plus-sized market.” I couldn’t believe it – there was no way she was plus-sized!!! Then one of the judges said she didn’t think it was possible for America’s next top model to be plus-sized. I was horrified. For an industry that is supposed to be innovative and cutting-edge, there is absolutely no vision, originality or courage anywhere in sight. What a bunch of hypocrites.

Posted by Rosepetal in 17:51:02 | Permalink | Comments Off

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Lookin’ sharp

What attracts you to someone? I don’t mean internally, I am purely talking physically. I have been wondering why I find my head turning when certain guys go by. More than that, I have been wondering why the way someone looks is such a powerful thing. Why does a pretty face (so to speak) make me want to look again?
There must be a degree to which our minds control the situation. Think about it, a doctor can look at a patient who looks good but not be affected because it is not professionally appropriate. A male gynecologist can look at a female patient’s genitals and not be turned on, yet that same gynecologist may look at his partner’s genitals and find them very attractive, because he is looking with another intent. Or think of a doctor dealing with a woman with breast cancer, and then looking at a different pair of breasts and finding them sexy.
Sometimes I get frustrated at myself when I find my head turning. If only because I like logic and there is no logic in attraction. But also because I never want to be seen as a piece of meat so I’d rather not see someone else that way. It never ceases to surprise me that people don’t see anything wrong with how much importance is placed on looks, and how socially acceptable it is for jaws to drop and eyes to pop out of heads at mere looks.
Posted by Rosepetal in 19:29:29 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Single  Married ?

So I was thinking the other day, how unusual. ;) I don’t know how I would cope with married life if it were to come. I have grown so used to being single, making my own decisions, keeping my own secrets. How do people learn to adapt and change to let someone else into their life? Are some people just more suited to life with a partner than others? Do people in a relationship ever feel like they would like to have 2 houses so that when they need time by themselves that option exists? Or at least separate rooms?
It’s funny, I keep wishing for a relationship. Suddenly I’m not even sure if I would be able to hold one down successfully. Do I want to give up my independence? Am I willing to share everything with one other person? Will my desire to be loved and my feelings of loneliness outweigh the claustrophobia that comes when I get too close to someone? Or will I be happy for a while in the presence of someone who loves me, only to find that once the loneliness and desire to be loved are taken care of I’m claustrophobic again?
Posted by Rosepetal in 16:47:46 | Permalink | Comments Off

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Dilemma

I was thinking about flowers today. I walked past a patch of earth. A week ago there were tulips growing there, but now nothing. It set me thinking about the length of life. Tulips are beautiful, they are vibrant and colourful, they are one of my favourite flowers. But they don’t live very long. This set me thinking about the length of our lives and asking a philosophical question.

Would you prefer to live a short life but very beautiful and bright and colourful, or would you prefer to live for a long time but have your life be mundane, ordinary, nothing special?

I’d love to hear your choices and your reasons why….

Posted by Rosepetal in 16:03:37 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Is change good?

I’m wondering…
Is it wrong (emotionally speaking) to change your behaviour because you want the esteem of others? I don’t mean give in to peer pressure, I mean change behaviour from what others consider negative to what others consider positive because you want them to have a good opinion of you? Like if you know that the person you like doesn’t like swearing so you decide to stop swearing even though it is not something you think is wrong? Or if you try to help out at a soup kitchen because you are worried that people might see you as shallow or self absorbed or unloving?

I don’t know if I am making sense. I am asking because I have been having thoughts lately about behaviour modification. They have come about through hearing about friends of mine and hearing them talk about what they love about each other. It struck me that they seemed better people than me, that they seemed so much better at loving and noticing little things about each other than I would be, and it made me feel like maybe the reason I am single is because I’m not good at giving out love in the same way so maybe I was deserving of receiving it. Suddenly I found myself wondering if I changed some things about myself whether I would be a more loveable person and maybe then I would find someone who would want to love me.

What I’m asking in this post is whether you think that is a dangerous path to head down? Am I setting myself up for a fall if I change my behaviour for the better in the hopes that someone will then like me? And is it a bad motivation for behaviour change? Is any impetus that brings about a positive change a good thing (the end justifies the means), or are my reasons for behaviour change just as important as the change itself? Does the end have less meaning if the means are corrupt?

I’d like to hear your thoughts. Let me know…

Posted by Rosepetal in 23:22:04 | Permalink | Comments Off

Friday, April 25, 2008

Negotiating with God

I was having a conversation the other day with my current housemate. We were talking about lots of different things to do with religion, in particular religion and sexuality. She was telling me that she has come across numerous Christian girls who believe that they shouldn’t have sex before marriage but who also believe that they have not violated their virginity if they give head-jobs. Both of us considered this to be a little off.
Let me explain my point of view. I have grown up as a Christian but at the moment I don’t know where I stand in terms of that. Even so I find myself having thoughts sometimes that I just hang onto for when I work out where I am on the whole God thing. This is one of those…

These girls are trying to live a very religious life. They are trying to make themselves right in the eyes of God by doing everything by the book. I think they are holding onto the idea that they can earn their way to heaven or into God’s good books (so to speak) by doing everything they are supposed to. But I can’t believe that is what God is looking for.
Working on the premise there is a God who loves people and wants us to know him and love and obey him, I can’t believe that what he wants is people to push boundaries to get away with as much as they can while still being ‘right’ in the eyes of God. God gave us free will because he wanted us to choose to love him. If he just wanted beings that behaved themselves perfectly all the time he would have created robots. But he created beings that could think for themselves, could choose for themselves. What do you think God thinks of human beings who follow him up to the very boundary of the letter of the law, but who follow him joylessly, meaninglessly, constantly trying to push that boundary and negotiate with God and with society as to what behaviour is acceptable?
I believe being a Christian and following God is about faith, not about doing everything right all the time. We can try all we want to do everything right all the time, but we will never succeed. And even if we could succeed in following all the laws we believe we should, ours hearts may not be obedient or repentant. Look at the Pharisees in Jesus day, they followed the Jewish laws to the letter, and Jesus was disgusted with them. He did not have a problem with them following the laws, but he saw their motives and their inner hearts too. He chose instead to spend time with the people who looked less than perfect, whose lives were full of mistakes. He looked past the mistakes and saw willing spirits. He saw people who could recognize their need for what he had to offer and came to him willingly.
I think that girls who think they are still a virgin until penetration occurs are fooling themselves because they want to do something they really deep-down believe they shouldn’t. And in this way I believe they are sinning. Sin is anything that separates us from God, usually our own selfish desires to go our own way or to get away with giving into temptation. That is why following the exact letter of the law (eg: virgin until penetration occurs) or trying to negotiate with God in this way just doesn’t work…

Posted by Rosepetal in 16:09:16 | Permalink | Comments Off